<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Dawn News - News</title>
    <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/</link>
    <description>Dawn News</description>
    <language>ur-PK</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:24:25 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:24:25 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>There was no curfew in Islamabad on Feb 9</title>
      <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000044/there-was-no-curfew-in-islamabad-on-feb-9</link>
      <description>&lt;h1&gt;Claim&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Curfew in Islamabad on Feb 9&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Rating Justification&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team has checked this content and has established that
  it is &lt;strong&gt;misleading&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To arrive at this verdict, the iVerify Pakistan team investigated the claim
  made by &lt;em&gt;The Independent&lt;/em&gt; by analysing its blog post and checking with
  the Islamabad police.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="how-it-started"&gt;HOW IT STARTED&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On February 9, 2024, British news outlet &lt;em&gt;The Independent&lt;/em&gt; published a
  blog on its &lt;a
    href="https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/south-asia/pakistan-election-results-nawaz-sharif-imran-khan-latest-b2492868.html?page=5"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;live updates&lt;/a&gt; for Pakistan’s
  general elections titled: “Curfew imposed in Islamabad.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The organisation shared the same claim on social media platform &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/Independent/status/1755930962423160904?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;X&lt;/a&gt; with the post gaining over
  21,000 views.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The alleged development was shared by another user, who appeared to be a PTI
  supporter based on his past posts, on &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/balochi5252/status/1755940551986196777?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;X&lt;/a&gt; and accumulated over 60,000
  views.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other users shared the post of the British outlet’s headline &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/AqssssFajr/status/1755949348574183885?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/SabeeKazmi786/status/1755946391598453118?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and by many others,
  including Ryan Grim, the DC bureau chief at &lt;em&gt;The Intercept&lt;/em&gt;, with his
  &lt;a href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1755929561311711573"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; gaining over 94,000
  views.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, other users observed exhibited confusion and uncertainty over the
  news and whether or not it was true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="methodology"&gt;METHODOLOGY&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team sought to determine the veracity of the claim due
  to its high virality, particularly given its connection to the election
  results which were already controversial due to their delayed release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The team first analysed the blog post for the news development. The text is
  reproduced below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Islamabad police say they are enforcing Section 144 orders banning public
  gatherings in the Pakistan capital as election results keep trickling in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The police wrote on X: ‘In case of any illegal action, action will be taken.
  Respect for the law is mandatory for everyone. Legal action will be taken in
  case of any disturbance.’&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When in force, a Section 144 order prohibits gatherings of four or more
  people. This section of the Criminal Procedure Code of Pakistan also empowers
  the district government to issue orders and/or ban any activity for a specific
  time in any region.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Police say the move is aimed at maintaining law and order once the results
  are out.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To verify the reported news, the iVerify team checked the official X account
  of the Islamabad police and found a &lt;a
    href="https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1755870600080306303"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; from Feb 9 at 1:25pm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post said, “Section 144 is enforced in Islamabad. In case of any illegal
  activity, action will be taken. Respect for the law is mandatory for everyone,
  and legal action will be taken in case of any disturbance.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post expressed gratitude from the police to citizens for their
  cooperation in conducting peaceful elections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, notably, both the blog post and the Islamabad police’s X post did
  not mention the imposition of a curfew.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The team conducted searches using the keywords “curfew” and “Islamabad” but
  did not find any other news report on the matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To better understand the term “curfew”, the team consulted Lawyer Usama
  Khawar. According to him, it is “incorrect to say that it is a curfew”,
  referring to the Section 144 imposition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elaborating, he said: “Section 144 prohibits people from gatherings. However,
  it doesn’t bar gathering altogether. A curfew, on the other hand, forces
  people to stay indoors for a specific period of time. In such a case when
  authorities impose a curfew for a certain period of time, the element of time
  remains crucial.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that prior approval was needed from the local police to venture out
  during a curfew, unlike during the imposition of Section 144.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As per Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, curfew &lt;a
    href="https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/curfew"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;means&lt;/a&gt;: “A law that says that
  people must not go outside after a particular time at night until the morning;
  the time after which nobody must go outside.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, &lt;a href="https://punjabpolice.gov.pk/faqs"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Section 144&lt;/a&gt; of the Code of
  Criminal Procedure (CrPC) empowers the district administration to issue orders
  in the public interest that may place a ban on an activity for a specific
  period of time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is &lt;a href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1808049" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;commonly used&lt;/a&gt; by local administrations to ban public
  gatherings, particularly political gatherings, due to threats to the law and
  order situation. However, there are other applications of the section as well
  such as banning going to the beach or banning open carrying of armed weapons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="results-of-general-elections-2024"&gt;RESULTS OF GENERAL ELECTIONS 2024
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The general elections were held in Pakistan on Feb 8 with polling coming to a
  close at 5pm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the results were not fully released even by the next day on Feb 9
  and continued to come out at a snail’s pace, leading to allegations of
  rigging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PTI Central Information Secretary Raoof Hasan had &lt;a
    href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1812970/pti-claims-victory-in-centre-kp-and-punjab"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;said&lt;/a&gt; on the matter: “PTI
  candidates were clearly winning with a huge margin in several constituencies,
  including Islamabad at night, but ironically, their clear victory was
  converted into defeat in the morning because political engineering was going
  on behind the scenes.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PTI supporters &lt;a
    href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1812912/supporters-of-winning-candidates-avoid-victory-rallies-in-islamabad"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;seemed to be upset&lt;/a&gt; over the
  results in Islamabad as they were anticipating victory in all three National
  Assembly seats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amid the complaints of rigging, the PML-N made a &lt;a
    href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1812913" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;clean sweep&lt;/a&gt; after 16 years by grabbing all the three
  seats of the National Assembly in the federal capital.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="conclusion"&gt;CONCLUSION&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team has determined that the claimed development from
  &lt;em&gt;The Independent&lt;/em&gt; report is &lt;strong&gt;misleading&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 144 and not a curfew was imposed in Islamabad on Feb 9 and both the
  blog post and the X post of the capital police confirm this since they do not
  make any mention of a curfew.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Evidence and References&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;February 9, 2024 X post by Islamabad police on Section 144 imposition:&lt;br&gt; &lt;a
    href="https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1755870600080306303"
    rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1755870600080306303&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h1>Claim</h1>
<p>Curfew in Islamabad on Feb 9</p>
<h1>Rating Justification</h1>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team has checked this content and has established that
  it is <strong>misleading</strong>.</p>
<p>To arrive at this verdict, the iVerify Pakistan team investigated the claim
  made by <em>The Independent</em> by analysing its blog post and checking with
  the Islamabad police.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-started">HOW IT STARTED</h2>
<p>On February 9, 2024, British news outlet <em>The Independent</em> published a
  blog on its <a
    href="https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/south-asia/pakistan-election-results-nawaz-sharif-imran-khan-latest-b2492868.html?page=5"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">live updates</a> for Pakistan’s
  general elections titled: “Curfew imposed in Islamabad.”</p>
<p>The organisation shared the same claim on social media platform <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/Independent/status/1755930962423160904?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">X</a> with the post gaining over
  21,000 views.</p>
<p>The alleged development was shared by another user, who appeared to be a PTI
  supporter based on his past posts, on <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/balochi5252/status/1755940551986196777?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">X</a> and accumulated over 60,000
  views.</p>
<p>Other users shared the post of the British outlet’s headline <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/AqssssFajr/status/1755949348574183885?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>, <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/SabeeKazmi786/status/1755946391598453118?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a> and by many others,
  including Ryan Grim, the DC bureau chief at <em>The Intercept</em>, with his
  <a href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1755929561311711573"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">post</a> gaining over 94,000
  views.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, other users observed exhibited confusion and uncertainty over the
  news and whether or not it was true.</p>
<h2 id="methodology">METHODOLOGY</h2>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team sought to determine the veracity of the claim due
  to its high virality, particularly given its connection to the election
  results which were already controversial due to their delayed release.</p>
<p>The team first analysed the blog post for the news development. The text is
  reproduced below:</p>
<p>“Islamabad police say they are enforcing Section 144 orders banning public
  gatherings in the Pakistan capital as election results keep trickling in.</p>
<p>The police wrote on X: ‘In case of any illegal action, action will be taken.
  Respect for the law is mandatory for everyone. Legal action will be taken in
  case of any disturbance.’</p>
<p>When in force, a Section 144 order prohibits gatherings of four or more
  people. This section of the Criminal Procedure Code of Pakistan also empowers
  the district government to issue orders and/or ban any activity for a specific
  time in any region.</p>
<p>Police say the move is aimed at maintaining law and order once the results
  are out.”</p>
<p>To verify the reported news, the iVerify team checked the official X account
  of the Islamabad police and found a <a
    href="https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1755870600080306303"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">post</a> from Feb 9 at 1:25pm.</p>
<p>The post said, “Section 144 is enforced in Islamabad. In case of any illegal
  activity, action will be taken. Respect for the law is mandatory for everyone,
  and legal action will be taken in case of any disturbance.”</p>
<p>The post expressed gratitude from the police to citizens for their
  cooperation in conducting peaceful elections.</p>
<p>However, notably, both the blog post and the Islamabad police’s X post did
  not mention the imposition of a curfew.</p>
<p>The team conducted searches using the keywords “curfew” and “Islamabad” but
  did not find any other news report on the matter.</p>
<p>To better understand the term “curfew”, the team consulted Lawyer Usama
  Khawar. According to him, it is “incorrect to say that it is a curfew”,
  referring to the Section 144 imposition.</p>
<p>Elaborating, he said: “Section 144 prohibits people from gatherings. However,
  it doesn’t bar gathering altogether. A curfew, on the other hand, forces
  people to stay indoors for a specific period of time. In such a case when
  authorities impose a curfew for a certain period of time, the element of time
  remains crucial.”</p>
<p>He added that prior approval was needed from the local police to venture out
  during a curfew, unlike during the imposition of Section 144.</p>
<p>As per Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, curfew <a
    href="https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/curfew"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">means</a>: “A law that says that
  people must not go outside after a particular time at night until the morning;
  the time after which nobody must go outside.”</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="https://punjabpolice.gov.pk/faqs"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Section 144</a> of the Code of
  Criminal Procedure (CrPC) empowers the district administration to issue orders
  in the public interest that may place a ban on an activity for a specific
  period of time.</p>
<p>It is <a href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1808049" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">commonly used</a> by local administrations to ban public
  gatherings, particularly political gatherings, due to threats to the law and
  order situation. However, there are other applications of the section as well
  such as banning going to the beach or banning open carrying of armed weapons.
</p>
<h2 id="results-of-general-elections-2024">RESULTS OF GENERAL ELECTIONS 2024
</h2>
<p>The general elections were held in Pakistan on Feb 8 with polling coming to a
  close at 5pm.</p>
<p>However, the results were not fully released even by the next day on Feb 9
  and continued to come out at a snail’s pace, leading to allegations of
  rigging.</p>
<p>PTI Central Information Secretary Raoof Hasan had <a
    href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1812970/pti-claims-victory-in-centre-kp-and-punjab"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">said</a> on the matter: “PTI
  candidates were clearly winning with a huge margin in several constituencies,
  including Islamabad at night, but ironically, their clear victory was
  converted into defeat in the morning because political engineering was going
  on behind the scenes.”</p>
<p>PTI supporters <a
    href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1812912/supporters-of-winning-candidates-avoid-victory-rallies-in-islamabad"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">seemed to be upset</a> over the
  results in Islamabad as they were anticipating victory in all three National
  Assembly seats.</p>
<p>Amid the complaints of rigging, the PML-N made a <a
    href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1812913" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">clean sweep</a> after 16 years by grabbing all the three
  seats of the National Assembly in the federal capital.</p>
<h2 id="conclusion">CONCLUSION</h2>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team has determined that the claimed development from
  <em>The Independent</em> report is <strong>misleading</strong>.</p>
<p>Section 144 and not a curfew was imposed in Islamabad on Feb 9 and both the
  blog post and the X post of the capital police confirm this since they do not
  make any mention of a curfew.</p>
<h1>Evidence and References</h1>
<p>February 9, 2024 X post by Islamabad police on Section 144 imposition:<br> <a
    href="https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1755870600080306303"
    rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">https://twitter.com/ICT_Police/status/1755870600080306303</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category/>
      <guid>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000044</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 04:28:47 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (CEJ)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/image-26.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="600" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/image-26.jpg"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
