<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Dawn News - News</title>
    <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/</link>
    <description>Dawn News</description>
    <language>ur-PK</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:24:44 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:24:44 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Javed Akhtar was not a winning candidate in the general elections 2024</title>
      <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000048/javed-akhtar-was-not-a-winning-candidate-in-the-general-elections-2024</link>
      <description>&lt;h1&gt;Claim&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Winning candidate Javed Akhtar Lund refuses to accept false mandate in
  elections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Rating Justification&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team has checked this content and has established that
  it is &lt;strong&gt;false&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To arrive at this verdict, the iVerify Pakistan team has analysed the video
  message of former Punjab Assembly member Javed Akhtar and checked the election
  results from the Election Commission of Pakistan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="how-it-started"&gt;HOW IT STARTED&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On February 11, 2024, news outlet &lt;em&gt;Naya Pakistan&lt;/em&gt; made a &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/Naya__Pakistan_/status/1756555509753131190?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on social media platform
  X regarding Akhtar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The caption quoted him as saying: “I have been forced to win. my opponent
  Sardar Farhat (PTI) had won. Defeating the winner is an insult to the people’s
  mandate.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The caption also said: “Independent candidate Javed Lund refuses to take fake
  mandate. Condemns rigging, congratulates PTI candidate.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notably, the caption did not mention which constituency Akhtar had supposedly
  won from.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post gained 1.9 million views and 40,000 reshares.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same video message with the caption was shared &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/siasatpk/status/1756562787776540741?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/kabeerraja786/status/1756645295121694795?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/iam_AhsanKhan/status/1756591579735740493?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://twitter.com/ahmad_bobak/status/1756543055971098687"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/AzharSiddique/status/1756613698448167248?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; with a combined 359,200
  views.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="methodology"&gt;METHODOLOGY&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team sought to determine the veracity of the claim due
  to its high virality and the public’s keen interest in the electoral success
  of PTI-backed candidates in the general elections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The team first analysed the attached video itself. The transcript is
  reproduced below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to the people of PP-286
  and NA-184 who voted for and supported us. I thank them from the depths of my
  heart. And amongst the winning candidates, I extend heartfelt congratulations
  to Ali Muhammad Khan and Sardar Farhat Khan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“In my view and the eyes of the public as well, they had already won.
  However, what happened afterwards is a different story and I strongly condemn
  it. A person who won by a lead of 37,000 votes was defeated and even a person
  who won by a lead of 15-16,000 votes was defeated. This is a violation of the
  public’s mandate and I condemn it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“I also extend my congratulations to them. The people gave them the mandate.
  The public voted for Imran Khan. What has happened is in front of all of you.
  We have accepted all of this wholeheartedly. People voted for Imran Khan,
  congratulations to him, but what is happening here after that is worthy of
  criticism and I strongly criticise it.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notably, the team observed that Akhtar did not say that he was forced to win
  against Sardar Farhat as attributed to him in the viral claim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team then checked the Form 47s uploaded on the results
  portal of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for Dera Gazi Khan’s
  NA-184 and PP-286 constituencies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contrary to the viral claim that Akhtar was the winning candidate who refused
  his mandate, Form 47 from both constituencies indicated that Javed was never
  declared the winner, as he did not come close to securing victory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As per the &lt;a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K1HSxTmXktJXLBHFLX50LpM-JyZlU8yE/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Form 47 of NA-184&lt;/a&gt;, PML-N’s
  Abdul Qadir Khan Khosa won with 110,999 votes while Akhtar received 507 votes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similarly, PML-N’s Salahuddin Khan Khosa secured 37,513 votes while Akhtar
  received 17,265 votes in PP-286 according to the &lt;a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bo3jjbNvcx_GVZBOWLRSTfLtuBV_qqnH/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Form 47&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="pti-rigging-allegations-in-2024-polls"&gt;PTI RIGGING ALLEGATIONS IN 2024
  POLLS&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As per the &lt;a href="https://www.elections.gov.pk/national-assembly"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;ECP portal&lt;/a&gt;, the results of 264
  of 266 National Assembly seats have been announced with independent candidates
  leading with 100 seats, followed by PML-N and PPP with 75 and 54 seats,
  respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PTI claimed that it had become the single largest party in the Centre and
  two provinces and has launched allegations of rigging and discrepancies in
  results as per Form 45s and Form 47s. The party has alleged that its
  candidates were in the lead as per Form 45s but others were made to win
  through Form 47s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other politicians have lent support to this narrative such as Jamaat-i-Islami
  (JI) Karachi chief Hafiz Naeem who &lt;a href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1813761"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;stepped down&lt;/a&gt; from his Sindh
  Assembly seat on Feb 12, saying: “A PTI-backed independent candidate has won,
  and I will not avail this seat.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similarly, former PPP senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar who contested the
  elections as an independent candidate posted the following &lt;a
    href="https://twitter.com/mustafa_nawazk/status/1755813613275664696"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;message&lt;/a&gt; on X on Feb 9: “I have
  no shame in saying that I openly admit my defeat. It is sad to see that PTI
  candidate Ali Bukhari has been defeated in Islamabad’s NA-48 while he was
  clearly winning. The person who was made the victor by changing the result was
  nowhere in the race.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Similarly, Shoaib Shaheen has also won from NA-47 with a clear margin, but
  the results are not being handed over to him either. This is the worst kind of
  rigging and playing with fire.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="conclusion"&gt;CONCLUSION&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team has determined that the claim regarding Akhtar
  being the winning candidate and refusing to accept his mandate is
  &lt;strong&gt;false&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the viral video message of his, he never made the alleged claim that was
  attributed to him and the official ECP results also showed that he did not win
  from the constituencies he was contesting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Evidence and References&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NA-184 Form 47:&lt;br&gt; &lt;a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K1HSxTmXktJXLBHFLX50LpM-JyZlU8yE/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K1HSxTmXktJXLBHFLX50LpM-JyZlU8yE/view&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PP-286 Form 47:&lt;br&gt; &lt;a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bo3jjbNvcx_GVZBOWLRSTfLtuBV_qqnH/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bo3jjbNvcx_GVZBOWLRSTfLtuBV_qqnH/view&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h1>Claim</h1>
<p>Winning candidate Javed Akhtar Lund refuses to accept false mandate in
  elections</p>
<h1>Rating Justification</h1>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team has checked this content and has established that
  it is <strong>false</strong>.</p>
<p>To arrive at this verdict, the iVerify Pakistan team has analysed the video
  message of former Punjab Assembly member Javed Akhtar and checked the election
  results from the Election Commission of Pakistan.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-started">HOW IT STARTED</h2>
<p>On February 11, 2024, news outlet <em>Naya Pakistan</em> made a <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/Naya__Pakistan_/status/1756555509753131190?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">post</a> on social media platform
  X regarding Akhtar.</p>
<p>The caption quoted him as saying: “I have been forced to win. my opponent
  Sardar Farhat (PTI) had won. Defeating the winner is an insult to the people’s
  mandate.”</p>
<p>The caption also said: “Independent candidate Javed Lund refuses to take fake
  mandate. Condemns rigging, congratulates PTI candidate.”</p>
<p>Notably, the caption did not mention which constituency Akhtar had supposedly
  won from.</p>
<p>The post gained 1.9 million views and 40,000 reshares.</p>
<p>The same video message with the caption was shared <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/siasatpk/status/1756562787776540741?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>, <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/kabeerraja786/status/1756645295121694795?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>, <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/iam_AhsanKhan/status/1756591579735740493?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>, <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://twitter.com/ahmad_bobak/status/1756543055971098687"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a> and <a
    href="https://web.archive.org/save/https://x.com/AzharSiddique/status/1756613698448167248?s=20"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a> with a combined 359,200
  views.</p>
<h2 id="methodology">METHODOLOGY</h2>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team sought to determine the veracity of the claim due
  to its high virality and the public’s keen interest in the electoral success
  of PTI-backed candidates in the general elections.</p>
<p>The team first analysed the attached video itself. The transcript is
  reproduced below:</p>
<p>“First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to the people of PP-286
  and NA-184 who voted for and supported us. I thank them from the depths of my
  heart. And amongst the winning candidates, I extend heartfelt congratulations
  to Ali Muhammad Khan and Sardar Farhat Khan.</p>
<p>“In my view and the eyes of the public as well, they had already won.
  However, what happened afterwards is a different story and I strongly condemn
  it. A person who won by a lead of 37,000 votes was defeated and even a person
  who won by a lead of 15-16,000 votes was defeated. This is a violation of the
  public’s mandate and I condemn it.</p>
<p>“I also extend my congratulations to them. The people gave them the mandate.
  The public voted for Imran Khan. What has happened is in front of all of you.
  We have accepted all of this wholeheartedly. People voted for Imran Khan,
  congratulations to him, but what is happening here after that is worthy of
  criticism and I strongly criticise it.”</p>
<p>Notably, the team observed that Akhtar did not say that he was forced to win
  against Sardar Farhat as attributed to him in the viral claim.</p>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team then checked the Form 47s uploaded on the results
  portal of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for Dera Gazi Khan’s
  NA-184 and PP-286 constituencies.</p>
<p>Contrary to the viral claim that Akhtar was the winning candidate who refused
  his mandate, Form 47 from both constituencies indicated that Javed was never
  declared the winner, as he did not come close to securing victory.</p>
<p>As per the <a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K1HSxTmXktJXLBHFLX50LpM-JyZlU8yE/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Form 47 of NA-184</a>, PML-N’s
  Abdul Qadir Khan Khosa won with 110,999 votes while Akhtar received 507 votes.
</p>
<p>Similarly, PML-N’s Salahuddin Khan Khosa secured 37,513 votes while Akhtar
  received 17,265 votes in PP-286 according to the <a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bo3jjbNvcx_GVZBOWLRSTfLtuBV_qqnH/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Form 47</a>.</p>
<h2 id="pti-rigging-allegations-in-2024-polls">PTI RIGGING ALLEGATIONS IN 2024
  POLLS</h2>
<p>As per the <a href="https://www.elections.gov.pk/national-assembly"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ECP portal</a>, the results of 264
  of 266 National Assembly seats have been announced with independent candidates
  leading with 100 seats, followed by PML-N and PPP with 75 and 54 seats,
  respectively.</p>
<p>The PTI claimed that it had become the single largest party in the Centre and
  two provinces and has launched allegations of rigging and discrepancies in
  results as per Form 45s and Form 47s. The party has alleged that its
  candidates were in the lead as per Form 45s but others were made to win
  through Form 47s.</p>
<p>Other politicians have lent support to this narrative such as Jamaat-i-Islami
  (JI) Karachi chief Hafiz Naeem who <a href="https://www.dawn.com/news/1813761"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">stepped down</a> from his Sindh
  Assembly seat on Feb 12, saying: “A PTI-backed independent candidate has won,
  and I will not avail this seat.”</p>
<p>Similarly, former PPP senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar who contested the
  elections as an independent candidate posted the following <a
    href="https://twitter.com/mustafa_nawazk/status/1755813613275664696"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">message</a> on X on Feb 9: “I have
  no shame in saying that I openly admit my defeat. It is sad to see that PTI
  candidate Ali Bukhari has been defeated in Islamabad’s NA-48 while he was
  clearly winning. The person who was made the victor by changing the result was
  nowhere in the race.</p>
<p>“Similarly, Shoaib Shaheen has also won from NA-47 with a clear margin, but
  the results are not being handed over to him either. This is the worst kind of
  rigging and playing with fire.”</p>
<h2 id="conclusion">CONCLUSION</h2>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team has determined that the claim regarding Akhtar
  being the winning candidate and refusing to accept his mandate is
  <strong>false</strong>.</p>
<p>In the viral video message of his, he never made the alleged claim that was
  attributed to him and the official ECP results also showed that he did not win
  from the constituencies he was contesting.</p>
<h1>Evidence and References</h1>
<p>NA-184 Form 47:<br> <a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K1HSxTmXktJXLBHFLX50LpM-JyZlU8yE/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K1HSxTmXktJXLBHFLX50LpM-JyZlU8yE/view</a>
</p>
<p>PP-286 Form 47:<br> <a
    href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bo3jjbNvcx_GVZBOWLRSTfLtuBV_qqnH/view"
    rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bo3jjbNvcx_GVZBOWLRSTfLtuBV_qqnH/view</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category/>
      <guid>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000048</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 04:28:47 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (CEJ)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/image-33.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="600" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/image-33.jpg"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
