<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Dawn News - News</title>
    <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/</link>
    <description>Dawn News</description>
    <language>ur-PK</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:40:01 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:40:01 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>IHC's Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb has not filed a petition against ISI chief in SC</title>
      <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000127/ihcs-justice-miangul-hassan-aurangzeb-has-not-filed-a-petition-against-isi-chief-in-sc</link>
      <description>&lt;h1&gt;Claim&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IHC’s Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb files petition against ISI chief in
  Supreme Court&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Rating Justification&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team has reviewed this content and determined that it is
  &lt;strong&gt;false&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reach this conclusion, the iVerify Pakistan team investigated whether the
  Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued any response to the serious allegation or
  not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="https://perma.cc/89VY-29EL" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on social media platform X on July 3, 2024, PTI MPA
  Fauzia Siddiqui claimed that IHC’s Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb filed a
  petition in the Supreme Court against the chief of the Inter Services
  Intelligence (ISI). However, the high court itself denied and categorically
  rejected the allegation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 25, six IHC judges — out of a total strength of eight — wrote a
  startling letter to the Supreme Judicial Council members, regarding attempts
  to pressure judges through abduction and torture of their relatives as well as
  secret surveillance inside their homes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The controversy has increased tensions between the judiciary and state
  apparatus with the case currently being heard in the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="how-it-started"&gt;HOW IT STARTED&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On July 3, 2024, a &lt;a href="https://perma.cc/89VY-29EL"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; by PTI MPA Siddiqui on
  social media platform X said: “Senior Justice Miangul Aurangzeb of the IHC has
  filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the ISI chief, alleging that
  intelligence agencies have threatened the families of the judges.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The MPA did not provide any petition, document or evidence for her claim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post was seen by more than 122,000 people as of 6:27pm on July 4 and was
  later taken down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same claim was shared by a PTI supporter as well &lt;a
    href="https://perma.cc/9B46-JVVZ" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and was seen by more than 16,000 people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The claim was shared by other X users as well &lt;a
    href="https://perma.cc/9EU5-R3M9" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://perma.cc/PG7N-YZMN"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notably, the posts did not name the incumbent ISI chief, Lieutenant General
  Nadeem Anjum, who assumed the position in October 2021.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="methodology"&gt;METHODOLOGY&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A fact check was initiated to determine the veracity of the claim due to its
  virality and the keen public interest in the matter as it contained a serious
  allegation about a sitting high court judge approaching the apex court against
  the intelligence chief amid a controversy already present in the country about
  friction between the judiciary and intelligence apparatus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Investigating whether the high court responded to the serious allegation
  yielded a press release via &lt;em&gt;Dawn.com&lt;/em&gt;‘s court correspondent in
  Islamabad Umer Burney.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IHC press release said the claim had been circulating on X and other
  social media platforms since July 3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“It is clarified that the contents of the said tweet/posts are not true and
  the same are baseless,” it categorically said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://i.imgur.com/Lp599yW.png" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dawn.com&lt;/em&gt;‘s Supreme Court correspondent Abdullah Momand also
  confirmed that no such petition was submitted to or present in the apex
  court’s records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="fact-check-status-false"&gt;FACT-CHECK STATUS: FALSE&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The claim of PTI MPA Fauzia Siddiqui regarding IHC’s Justice Aurangzeb
  submitting a petition in the apex court against the ISI chief is
  &lt;strong&gt;false&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IHC itself released a statement categorically stating that the circulated
  claim was false and baseless. Furthermore, the MPA did not provide any
  document as evidence nor is any such petition present in the apex court’s
  records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Evidence and References&lt;/h1&gt;
null</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h1>Claim</h1>
<p>IHC’s Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb files petition against ISI chief in
  Supreme Court</p>
<h1>Rating Justification</h1>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team has reviewed this content and determined that it is
  <strong>false</strong>.</p>
<p>To reach this conclusion, the iVerify Pakistan team investigated whether the
  Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued any response to the serious allegation or
  not.</p>
<p>In a <a href="https://perma.cc/89VY-29EL" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">post</a> on social media platform X on July 3, 2024, PTI MPA
  Fauzia Siddiqui claimed that IHC’s Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb filed a
  petition in the Supreme Court against the chief of the Inter Services
  Intelligence (ISI). However, the high court itself denied and categorically
  rejected the allegation.</p>
<p>On March 25, six IHC judges — out of a total strength of eight — wrote a
  startling letter to the Supreme Judicial Council members, regarding attempts
  to pressure judges through abduction and torture of their relatives as well as
  secret surveillance inside their homes.</p>
<p>The controversy has increased tensions between the judiciary and state
  apparatus with the case currently being heard in the Supreme Court.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-started">HOW IT STARTED</h2>
<p>On July 3, 2024, a <a href="https://perma.cc/89VY-29EL"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">post</a> by PTI MPA Siddiqui on
  social media platform X said: “Senior Justice Miangul Aurangzeb of the IHC has
  filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the ISI chief, alleging that
  intelligence agencies have threatened the families of the judges.”</p>
<p>The MPA did not provide any petition, document or evidence for her claim.</p>
<p>The post was seen by more than 122,000 people as of 6:27pm on July 4 and was
  later taken down.</p>
<p>The same claim was shared by a PTI supporter as well <a
    href="https://perma.cc/9B46-JVVZ" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">here</a> and was seen by more than 16,000 people.</p>
<p>The claim was shared by other X users as well <a
    href="https://perma.cc/9EU5-R3M9" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="https://perma.cc/PG7N-YZMN"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Notably, the posts did not name the incumbent ISI chief, Lieutenant General
  Nadeem Anjum, who assumed the position in October 2021.</p>
<h2 id="methodology">METHODOLOGY</h2>
<p>A fact check was initiated to determine the veracity of the claim due to its
  virality and the keen public interest in the matter as it contained a serious
  allegation about a sitting high court judge approaching the apex court against
  the intelligence chief amid a controversy already present in the country about
  friction between the judiciary and intelligence apparatus.</p>
<p>Investigating whether the high court responded to the serious allegation
  yielded a press release via <em>Dawn.com</em>‘s court correspondent in
  Islamabad Umer Burney.</p>
<p>The IHC press release said the claim had been circulating on X and other
  social media platforms since July 3.</p>
<p>“It is clarified that the contents of the said tweet/posts are not true and
  the same are baseless,” it categorically said.</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/Lp599yW.png" alt=""></p>
<p><em>Dawn.com</em>‘s Supreme Court correspondent Abdullah Momand also
  confirmed that no such petition was submitted to or present in the apex
  court’s records.</p>
<h2 id="fact-check-status-false">FACT-CHECK STATUS: FALSE</h2>
<p>The claim of PTI MPA Fauzia Siddiqui regarding IHC’s Justice Aurangzeb
  submitting a petition in the apex court against the ISI chief is
  <strong>false</strong>.</p>
<p>The IHC itself released a statement categorically stating that the circulated
  claim was false and baseless. Furthermore, the MPA did not provide any
  document as evidence nor is any such petition present in the apex court’s
  records.</p>
<h1>Evidence and References</h1>
null]]></content:encoded>
      <category/>
      <guid>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000127</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 04:28:47 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (CEJ)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-17.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="600" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-17.jpg"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
