<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Dawn News - News</title>
    <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/</link>
    <description>Dawn News</description>
    <language>ur-PK</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:57:38 +0500</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:57:38 +0500</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
      <title>Leaked scandalous images do not show Iddat case judge Afzal Majoka</title>
      <link>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000267/leaked-scandalous-images-do-not-show-iddat-case-judge-afzal-majoka-2</link>
      <description>&lt;h1&gt;Claim&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leaked porn images of judge hearing Imran Khan’s Iddat case&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Rating Justification&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iVerify Pakistan team has reviewed this content and determined that it is
  &lt;strong&gt;false&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To reach this conclusion, the iVerify Pakistan team investigated the leaked
  pictures to determine if they actually featured Additional District and
  Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Mohammad Afzal Majoka, who is hearing the Iddat case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple posts circulating on social media platform X since June 20, 2024,
  claimed that a scandalous video of the judge hearing PTI founder Imran Khan’s
  Iddat case was leaked and alleged screenshots from it were shared as well.
  However, the images are not of ADSJ Majoka.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On February 3, an Islamabad court sentenced Imran and his wife, Bushra Bibi,
  to seven years in jail each for marrying during the Iddat period. Both
  appealed the decision, and Judge Shahrukh Arjumand reserved his verdict on May
  23. However, the ruling was deferred on May 29 after the judge requested the
  case be transferred due to a conflict of interest with the complainant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PTI subsequently alleged that the judge was threatened and pressured not
  to announce his reserved verdict. The case was then transferred to ADSJ
  Majoka’s session court. On June 22, the judge instructed the petitioner’s
  lawyer to conclude his arguments by June 25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="how-it-started"&gt;HOW IT STARTED&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On June 20, 2024, a &lt;a href="https://perma.cc/8W9E-7BEK"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; was shared by a user on
  X, who appeared to be a PTI supporter based on her past posts, claiming, “The
  porn video of the judge hearing the Iddat case against Imran Khan has surfaced
  in public. This is the situation of our judges.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The user did not share the video, saying it was “too embarrassing”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post was seen by more than 39,000 users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same claim, along with alleged screenshots from the video, was &lt;a
    href="https://perma.cc/8CXF-K8TU" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;shared&lt;/a&gt; by a fan page for journalist Kashif Abbasi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post was seen by more than 27,000 users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same pictures with similar captions were also shared by other X users &lt;a
    href="https://perma.cc/8H9U-8BM5" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://perma.cc/KV6L-L4V7"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="methodology"&gt;METHODOLOGY&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A fact check was initiated to determine the veracity of the claim due to its
  virality and in the public interest as it concerned the judge who is currently
  hearing Imran’s Iddat case in which there is keen audience interest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To investigate the claim, a search for the judge’s picture to determine his
  physical appearance was conducted to corroborate it with the person in the
  leaked images.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The search yielded a &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1SKUPUI6fY"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;video&lt;/a&gt; of the judge uploaded to
  YouTube on October 21, 2019, from his tenure as the Gujranwala ADSJ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comparing the judge with the person in the leaked images clearly shows they
  are different individuals with the former having black hair and a moustache
  while the latter has white.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dawn.com&lt;/em&gt; reporter Umer Burney, who covers court reporting in
  Islamabad, also verified that the person in the leaked images was not the same
  as ADSJ Majoka, saying that the latter still had black hair.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://i.imgur.com/gUL6etR.jpeg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar fact check was previously conducted on the judge who was hearing
  the Iddat case at the time with claims that he was featured in a dancing
  video. The claims were &lt;a
    href="https://pak.i-verify.org/alleged-viral-video-of-iddat-case-judge-shahrukh-arjumand-doesnt-feature-him/"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;false&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="fact-check-status-false"&gt;FACT-CHECK STATUS: FALSE&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The claim regarding scandalous images from a leaked porn video of ADSJ
  Majoka, who is hearing the Iddat case, is &lt;strong&gt;false&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The viral pictures do not show the judge but an unidentified person who
  presents different physical features than ADSJ Majoka.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;Evidence and References&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;October 21, 2019, YouTube video of Judge Afzal Majoka &lt;br&gt; &lt;a
    href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1SKUPUI6fY" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1SKUPUI6fY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<h1>Claim</h1>
<p>Leaked porn images of judge hearing Imran Khan’s Iddat case</p>
<h1>Rating Justification</h1>
<p>The iVerify Pakistan team has reviewed this content and determined that it is
  <strong>false</strong>.</p>
<p>To reach this conclusion, the iVerify Pakistan team investigated the leaked
  pictures to determine if they actually featured Additional District and
  Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Mohammad Afzal Majoka, who is hearing the Iddat case.
</p>
<p>Multiple posts circulating on social media platform X since June 20, 2024,
  claimed that a scandalous video of the judge hearing PTI founder Imran Khan’s
  Iddat case was leaked and alleged screenshots from it were shared as well.
  However, the images are not of ADSJ Majoka.</p>
<p>On February 3, an Islamabad court sentenced Imran and his wife, Bushra Bibi,
  to seven years in jail each for marrying during the Iddat period. Both
  appealed the decision, and Judge Shahrukh Arjumand reserved his verdict on May
  23. However, the ruling was deferred on May 29 after the judge requested the
  case be transferred due to a conflict of interest with the complainant.</p>
<p>The PTI subsequently alleged that the judge was threatened and pressured not
  to announce his reserved verdict. The case was then transferred to ADSJ
  Majoka’s session court. On June 22, the judge instructed the petitioner’s
  lawyer to conclude his arguments by June 25.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-started">HOW IT STARTED</h2>
<p>On June 20, 2024, a <a href="https://perma.cc/8W9E-7BEK"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">post</a> was shared by a user on
  X, who appeared to be a PTI supporter based on her past posts, claiming, “The
  porn video of the judge hearing the Iddat case against Imran Khan has surfaced
  in public. This is the situation of our judges.”</p>
<p>The user did not share the video, saying it was “too embarrassing”.</p>
<p>The post was seen by more than 39,000 users.</p>
<p>The same claim, along with alleged screenshots from the video, was <a
    href="https://perma.cc/8CXF-K8TU" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">shared</a> by a fan page for journalist Kashif Abbasi.</p>
<p>The post was seen by more than 27,000 users.</p>
<p>The same pictures with similar captions were also shared by other X users <a
    href="https://perma.cc/8H9U-8BM5" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="https://perma.cc/KV6L-L4V7"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<h2 id="methodology">METHODOLOGY</h2>
<p>A fact check was initiated to determine the veracity of the claim due to its
  virality and in the public interest as it concerned the judge who is currently
  hearing Imran’s Iddat case in which there is keen audience interest.</p>
<p>To investigate the claim, a search for the judge’s picture to determine his
  physical appearance was conducted to corroborate it with the person in the
  leaked images.</p>
<p>The search yielded a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1SKUPUI6fY"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">video</a> of the judge uploaded to
  YouTube on October 21, 2019, from his tenure as the Gujranwala ADSJ.</p>
<p>Comparing the judge with the person in the leaked images clearly shows they
  are different individuals with the former having black hair and a moustache
  while the latter has white.</p>
<p><em>Dawn.com</em> reporter Umer Burney, who covers court reporting in
  Islamabad, also verified that the person in the leaked images was not the same
  as ADSJ Majoka, saying that the latter still had black hair.</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/gUL6etR.jpeg" alt=""></p>
<p>A similar fact check was previously conducted on the judge who was hearing
  the Iddat case at the time with claims that he was featured in a dancing
  video. The claims were <a
    href="https://pak.i-verify.org/alleged-viral-video-of-iddat-case-judge-shahrukh-arjumand-doesnt-feature-him/"
    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">false</a>.</p>
<h2 id="fact-check-status-false">FACT-CHECK STATUS: FALSE</h2>
<p>The claim regarding scandalous images from a leaked porn video of ADSJ
  Majoka, who is hearing the Iddat case, is <strong>false</strong>.</p>
<p>The viral pictures do not show the judge but an unidentified person who
  presents different physical features than ADSJ Majoka.</p>
<h1>Evidence and References</h1>
<p>October 21, 2019, YouTube video of Judge Afzal Majoka <br> <a
    href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1SKUPUI6fY" rel="noopener noreferrer"
    target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1SKUPUI6fY</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category/>
      <guid>https://www.iverifypakistan.com/news/1000267</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 04:28:48 +0500</pubDate>
      <author>none@none.com (CEJ)</author>
      <media:content url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/image-14.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="600" width="800">
        <media:thumbnail url="https://i.iverifypakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/image-14.jpg"/>
        <media:title/>
      </media:content>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
